Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has decided to take a stand against a major party’s presidential candidate in a way that she—and arguably no prior justice—has ever done before. Over the course of several interviews, the justice has spent the last few days hammering Donald Trump for his reckless campaign and outrageous policies, suggesting that a President Trump would pose a serious danger to the republic. Her explicitly political statements set off a familiar firestorm about whether Ginsburg had “crossed the line,” sending the conservative blogosphere in particular into howling fantods. Critics on the left and right have criticized Ginsburg’s comments as explosive, unprecedented, and unethical.
To recap the controversy, Ginsburg’s campaign began with a light jab at Trump in a Thursday interview, in which the justice admitted she didn’t “want to think about” the possibility of a Trump presidency. Then, on Friday, Ginsburg told the New York Times’ Adam Liptak, “I can’t imagine what this plac...
Also read: The New Yorker Endorses Hillary Clinton
00:03 Lawyer Accuses Justice Thomas of Groping Her at Party in 199911
22:10 Trump delivers 30-minute speech in downtown Toledo12
18:55 Putin Terms Claims of Meddling in US Elections as 'Hysteria'; Asks is US a Banana Republic12
09:31 Clinton leads by 6 points, Post-ABC tracking poll finds13